Search

Cookies

We use cookies to improve your experience. By continuing, you accept our use of cookies.

Business

Ex-Ambassador: Trump Can't Afford 100% Tariffs; India Shouldn't Worry Yet

· · 3 min read

Former Indian diplomat K.P. Fabian believes the US Senate's sanctions bill, allowing 100% tariffs on Russian oil buyers like India, faces significant hurdles in the House and may not be implemented due to potential economic fallout. He advises India against premature concern.

Former Indian diplomat K.P. Fabian has suggested that India should not be overly concerned about the US Senate's recently passed sanctions bill, which includes a provision for 100% tariffs on countries importing Russian oil. Speaking on Sunday, Fabian expressed skepticism about the bill's ultimate passage through the House of Representatives and its potential implementation by former President Donald Trump, citing the severe economic repercussions it could trigger for the United States.

Uncertain Congressional Path Ahead

The US Senate approved the sanctions bill with an 86-11 vote, but its journey through Congress is far from over. Fabian highlighted that the legislation now requires approval from the House of Representatives, which is set to convene on August 10. However, he noted that the bill is unlikely to be the first item on the House's agenda.

"The House may or may not approve the bill as it is, because this bill gives President Trump the option to impose tariffs and also to revoke them," Fabian explained, adding that the measure also covers Iranian oil.

The former diplomat further elaborated on the legislative complexities, suggesting that the House could amend the bill. Any amendments would necessitate its return to the Senate, potentially leading to a protracted back-and-forth process. Fabian, who served in the Indian Foreign Service from 1964 to 2000, including postings as envoy to several nations, emphasized the uncertainty surrounding the bill's final form.

Potential Economic Fallout for the US

A major point of concern for Fabian is the economic impact if the bill were to clear Congress and President Trump were to impose the tariffs. He warned that such a move would inevitably lead to a sharp increase in global oil prices. More critically, he questioned whether the American economy, already facing challenges like thousands of job losses according to recent Labor Department statements, could withstand such a shock.

"Do you think President Trump can afford it? The American economy is already in trouble... So it is not something that Trump can afford," Fabian asserted. "I don't think we in India should get very worked up on that."

The Lindsey O. Graham Sanctioning Russia and Iran Act of 2026

The bipartisan legislation, officially known as the Lindsey O. Graham Sanctioning Russia and Iran Act of 2026, aims to penalize Russia and key buyers of its petroleum products, including China and India. Washington argues that this trade helps finance the ongoing conflict in Ukraine. The bill allows for the imposition of 100% tariffs on goods from countries among the top five importers of Russian oil and gas, which currently include China, India, Azerbaijan, Hungary, and Slovakia.

Additionally, the measure seeks to extend the Iran Sanctions Act of 1996 until 2031, which targets companies investing in Iran's energy sector. The bill was championed by Republican Senator Lindsey Graham, who passed away on July 11, and Democrat Richard Blumenthal. Following Graham's death, lawmakers from both parties pushed for the bill's passage to honor his legacy. Darline Graham, the late senator's sister and his appointed successor, stated that the bill forces primary countries supporting Russia's economy to choose between doing business with America or buying cheap Russian energy.

India's Position Amidst Tariff Threats

Despite the strong rhetoric surrounding the bill, Fabian's comments suggest a strategic patience for India. His assessment points to significant domestic hurdles within the US legislative process and the potential economic self-harm for the US, implying that the threat of 100% tariffs may not materialize as quickly or as severely as initially feared.

Related