Former Infosys Chief Financial Officer Mohandas Pai has strongly refuted claims made by US Congressman Riley Moore regarding India's proposed amendments to the Foreign Contribution (Regulation) Act (FCRA). Pai accused Moore of disseminating a "fake narrative" and ignoring factual details about the legislation, emphasizing that similar penal provisions exist in the United States.
US Congressman Alleges Attack on Religious Charities
On Tuesday, Republican Congressman Riley Moore, representing West Virginia's 2nd congressional district, voiced concerns over the FCRA amendments currently under consideration by the Indian Parliament. Moore claimed that the proposed changes would enable the Indian government to seize control of churches and religious charities, describing it as a "clear attack against Christians." He warned that if the bill proceeds in its current form, it would become a significant point of contention in bilateral relations between India and the US.
Pai Counters Claims, Cites US Parallels
In response, Mohandas Pai took to social media, urging Moore to consult the facts. "This new law brings in penal provisions for breaking the law. If you misuse money given by outsiders for wrong purposes, then this kicks in. The US too has such penal provisions for misuse," Pai stated. He underscored that the amendments are aimed at ensuring transparency and accountability in the utilization of foreign funds, not at targeting any specific religious group.
Indian Voices Defend Sovereign Right and Transparency
Several other prominent Indian figures have also come forward to defend New Delhi's stance. Shesh Paul Vaid, former Director General of Police for Jammu and Kashmir, asserted India's sovereign right to enact laws deemed necessary for its populace, stating, "We don't dictate USA what laws to enact by her Congress." Vaid clarified that the FCRA amendments focus solely on transparency in foreign funding and the end use of money, without mentioning or targeting any religion.
Author and public affairs strategist Savio Rodrigues echoed these sentiments, explaining that the FCRA serves as a regulatory framework based on national security guidelines. He noted that it applies uniformly to all entities receiving foreign contributions, including NGOs, charities, and religious organizations. Rodrigues emphasized that actions would be taken against any organization violating the law, irrespective of its religious affiliation.
Government's Position on FCRA
The Indian government had previously released a detailed factsheet defending the proposed FCRA amendments. The Centre reiterated that the law promotes transparency, accountability, and national security, rather than restricting legitimate foreign funding. It clarified that the FCRA does not prohibit foreign donations to NGOs, charities, or religious organizations but mandates registration, designated bank accounts, and proper disclosure—principles it likens to compliance in banking and company law. The government highlighted that transparency in foreign funding is crucial for democratic accountability, especially concerning attempts to influence public policy or elections through covert financing, a frontline national security issue globally.